Logan Paul, a leading social media influencer with over 23 million YouTube followers, is under fire for alleged misconduct involving cryptocurrency investments. Accusations range from promoting high-risk crypto projects to profiting from undisclosed trades, leaving fans and investors questioning his integrity.
Recent investigations by the BBC and other outlets have uncovered compelling evidence suggesting Paul may have exploited his massive influence to manipulate crypto markets, reaping financial rewards while leaving unsuspecting fans to face losses. This comes amid ongoing lawsuits, including one concerning his failed venture, CryptoZoo.
Also read: Polter Finance Halts Operations After $12M Flash Loan Hack
The Rise of Logan Paul’s Crypto Endeavors
Paul first rose to prominence through platforms like Vine and YouTube, where his humorous and often controversial content amassed a global fanbase. Over the past three years, his focus shifted to cryptocurrency—a booming yet volatile market.
In 2021, Paul began heavily promoting “meme coins,” a category of cryptocurrencies with little intrinsic value and high susceptibility to price manipulation. Meme coins, such as Elongate and Dink Doink, are primarily traded based on internet hype, often leading to rapid price surges followed by steep crashes.
One of Paul’s most notable endorsements was for Elongate, a coin inspired by billionaire Elon Musk. Paul publicly praised the token, exclaiming, “Elongate made me rich. Elon baby, let’s go!” This endorsement caused Elongate’s value to skyrocket by 6,000% before it plummeted shortly after.
Allegations of Undisclosed Trade
The controversy deepened with revelations of undisclosed trades linked to an anonymous crypto wallet. This wallet, reportedly tied to Paul, made a profit of $120,000 from Elongate shortly after his public endorsement.
Crypto wallets, essential for storing and trading digital assets, can be anonymous unless explicitly linked to an individual. Investigations revealed this particular wallet had received funds from Paul’s public wallet before engaging in the trades, raising questions about potential insider activity.
Paul has not responded to these specific allegations, though his legal team has denied any wrongdoing.
Dink Doink and the Meme Coin Crash
Another project that drew significant backlash was Dink Doink, a meme coin marketed as part of a “community-driven” ecosystem. Paul enthusiastically promoted the token on platforms like Twitter and Telegram, claiming, “I think it’s going to go crazy.”
Dink Doink initially experienced a surge in value, attracting thousands of investors. However, within two weeks, its price had dropped by 96%, leaving many investors with substantial losses.
Further investigations revealed an anonymous wallet tied to the project had made significant profits before the crash and later transferred $100,000 to Paul’s public wallet. Paul’s lawyers acknowledged the transfer but denied it was related to the coin’s promotion.
CryptoZoo: A Promised Game That Never Delivered
Paul’s most high-profile crypto controversy stems from CryptoZoo, an ambitious project marketed as an online NFT-based game. Participants were encouraged to buy Zoo Tokens and NFT “eggs,” which were supposed to hatch into unique hybrid animals that could generate passive income.
The project raised $18.5 million from eager investors, but it quickly unraveled. Bugs plagued the platform, promised features were absent, and the value of Zoo Tokens and NFT eggs collapsed.
Investors, including young fans like 21-year-old Rueben Tauk, lost significant sums. Tauk, who invested £33,000 in the project, described feeling betrayed by someone he once admired.
At least 130 investors are now suing Paul, alleging fraud and insider trading. Legal documents suggest Paul and his team engaged in a “stealth launch,” secretly buying tokens at low prices before selling them after the project’s launch.
Paul has repeatedly denied these allegations, instead blaming other team members for the project’s failure.
Legal Repercussions and Regulatory Concerns
Logan Paul’s crypto controversies mirror a broader issue involving celebrities and crypto promotions. In 2022, Kim Kardashian was fined $1.26 million for promoting a token without disclosing she was paid to do so.
Gary Gensler, Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), emphasized that public figures promoting crypto must disclose financial ties. “If a celebrity is promoting a crypto token, they are supposed to tell you if they get paid, how much, and whether they own the tokens,” Gensler stated.
Paul’s case has drawn parallels, as he faces scrutiny not only from investors but potentially from regulators investigating undisclosed financial interests.
A Tarnished Image?
Despite the mounting allegations,his influence shows little sign of waning. He has diversified his career, venturing into boxing, wrestling, and co-founding Prime, a viral beverage brand with fellow influencer KSI.
However, for fans like Rueben Tauk, the damage is irreversible. “Once you trust someone and they betray that trust, their words don’t mean anything anymore,” he said.
Paul’s legal battles, including a libel suit against a critic in the U.S., highlight the complexity of his situation. While he continues to maintain his innocence, the controversies surrounding his crypto ventures could leave a lasting mark on his legacy.
