In a recent clash of crypto ideologies, Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, openly criticized Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy, for his controversial stance on Bitcoin custody. Saylor, a prominent Bitcoin advocate, suggested that Bitcoin holders should rely on large, regulated banks for safekeeping their assets, rather than embracing the self-custody methods commonly promoted in the decentralized community.
Saylor’s Controversial View on Bitcoin Custody
In an interview on the Markets with Madison podcast, Michael Saylor dismissed concerns over government seizure of Bitcoin, calling such fears “paranoid” and unsupported. He further argued that Bitcoin holders who use self-custody methods, like hardware wallets, face a higher risk of seizure compared to those who entrust their assets to large financial institutions. According to Michael Saylor, major banks are more equipped to manage regulatory and legal obligations, offering greater security for investors.
Saylor’s comments starkly contrast with the cypherpunk ethos, which prioritizes individual control over digital assets. His perspective that 99.9% of financial assets reside in the traditional economy and should be handled by regulated entities sparked outrage among decentralization advocates.
Buterin’s Strong Rebuttal
Vitalik Buterin responded sharply, calling Michael Saylor’s view on Bitcoin custody “batsh*t insane.” He critiqued Saylor’s advocacy for a regulatory capture approach, arguing that this mindset threatens the very foundation of cryptocurrency — decentralization and individual sovereignty. Buterin further emphasized that advancements in cryptography, such as zk-SNARKs and account abstraction, have enhanced the tools available for self-custody, making reliance on banks unnecessary and risky.
Also read: Indicted NYC Mayor Eric Adams’ Crypto Promises Under Scrutiny Amid Legal Troubles
Community Reactions and Concerns
Buterin’s criticisms were echoed by notable figures in the crypto space. Jameson Lopp, co-founder of Casa, stressed the importance of decentralization, warning against the centralization of Bitcoin holdings under institutional control. Lopp argued that self-custody empowers individuals to actively participate in Bitcoin’s governance and ensures that the ecosystem remains decentralized.
Similarly, Simon Dixon and John Carvalho raised concerns about Saylor’s comments. They suggested that MicroStrategy’s growing role in Bitcoin might influence Saylor’s position, potentially aiming to position the company as a Bitcoin bank. Critics warned that pushing Bitcoin into the hands of large institutions could undermine its potential as a decentralized currency and reduce it to a mere investment tool.
